1. Lessons Learned¶
Purpose
Structuring and documenting insights gained so that future AI projects benefit from them.
1. Objective¶
We formally close the project by structuring, documenting and making available the insights gained for future AI projects within the organisation.
2. Entry Criteria¶
- Gate 4 (Go-Live) has been approved and the system has been handed over to the management organisation.
- All project members are available for the closing session.
- The project dossier (artefacts, validation reports, decision log) is complete.
3. Core Activities¶
Lessons Learned Session¶
Organise one structured closing session of 3 to 4 hours with the full project team. Use the 4L format:
| L | Question | Focus |
|---|---|---|
| Liked | What worked well and do we want to keep? | Strong approach, good collaboration |
| Learned | What did we learn that we didn't know? | Surprises in data, model, governance |
| Lacked | What was missing and would have helped? | Knowledge, tools, time, mandate |
| Longed for | What did we wish had been different? | Structural wishes for the organisation |
AI-specific additional questions:
- How accurate was our initial risk assessment (Pre-Scan)?
- Which data quality problems surprised us the most?
- Was the Golden Set representative enough? What would we compose differently?
- How effective was the Guardian role in practice?
- Which Hard Boundaries turned out to be too narrow or too broad in retrospect?
- Were the chosen Collaboration Modes correctly estimated?
Documentation and Dissemination¶
After the session:
- Write a summary (max. 2 A4) with the top 5 insights per category.
- Include the summary in the project archive.
- Report relevant insights to the AI CoE or knowledge management officer.
- Translate critical findings into adjustments to the Blueprint (via
feature/<topic>branch).
Feedback Loop to the Blueprint¶
Lessons Learned are the most important source of improvement for this Blueprint. If a finding shows that a template, checklist or procedure is inadequate, we follow this process:
- Register it as an improvement proposal (GitHub Issue or internal equivalent).
- Discuss it with the authors of the Blueprint.
- Process it in the next version with a mention in the Release Notes.
4. Team & Roles¶
| Role | Responsibility | R/A/C/I |
|---|---|---|
| AI Product Manager | Facilitates the session, writes the summary | A |
| Tech Lead | Delivers technical insights and modelling experience | R |
| Guardian | Reports on governance effectiveness | R |
| Data Scientist | Reports on data trajectory and model development | R |
| End users (optional) | Provide perspective on usability and adoption | C |
5. Exit Criteria¶
- Lessons Learned session has taken place with all core team members.
- Summary has been prepared and included in the project archive.
- Relevant insights have been passed on to the knowledge management officer.
- Improvement proposals for the Blueprint have been registered.
6. Deliverables¶
| Deliverable | Description | Owner |
|---|---|---|
| Lessons Learned Summary | Top 5 insights per 4L category (max. 2 A4) | AI PM |
| Blueprint Improvement Proposals | Registered change requests | AI PM |
| Project Archive | Fully archived dossier | AI PM |
Related modules:
- Project Closure — Overview
- Handover Procedures
- Benefits Realisation
- Gate Reviews Checklist
- Retrospectives
Next step: Prepare the formal handover via Handover Procedures → See also: Retrospectives
Was this page helpful?
Give feedback